tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post8234351422428462153..comments2024-03-18T08:21:18.269+01:00Comments on Shatner's Toupee: The Andersonville Trial - a toupological analysis.ShatToupBloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17135455289206032317noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-41521644128935524032021-03-06T00:02:21.944+01:002021-03-06T00:02:21.944+01:00Bill Shatner was accused of stealing two toupees a...Bill Shatner was accused of stealing two toupees after Season 2 of TOS..... Too bad he didn't steal one of his Jim Kirk girdles when TOS was finally cancelled and used it for "The Andersonville Trial" shoot. Talk about love handles!Captain Spalding (USN-Ret'd.)http://theretiredcaptains.usn.govnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-45949838505554305072016-09-14T13:13:33.507+02:002016-09-14T13:13:33.507+02:00Exactly, Hairy Palmer, and that is why we need to ...Exactly, Hairy Palmer, and that is why we need to especially salute Mr Shatner for his superb acting on this occasion. With the sheer abundance of toups on display here, it is testament to Bill's incredible acting ability that he is able to rise above the weight of visual faux hair distractions and give one of the finest performances of his career. Definitely worth of an Emmy.chrome(dome) magnonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-4304737399113916942010-04-17T03:10:22.946+02:002010-04-17T03:10:22.946+02:00Explains many a hair raising experience encountere...Explains many a hair raising experience encountered by the Enterprise, where men have baldly gone before.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-53550565245036813532010-02-17T23:43:58.195+01:002010-02-17T23:43:58.195+01:00star trek scrapbook has a feature from sept 1974
h...star trek scrapbook has a feature from sept 1974<br />http://tinyurl.com/ya9hag6LVDSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-3682739183473938872010-02-17T21:05:58.733+01:002010-02-17T21:05:58.733+01:00ToupfestToupfesttouringnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-43532385676686093732010-02-17T17:17:49.005+01:002010-02-17T17:17:49.005+01:00It´s a period piece, and there's lot of wigs. ...It´s a period piece, and there's lot of wigs. But Shatner gets noticed, anyway.Spy Treknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-56557405052147149372010-02-17T16:27:31.022+01:002010-02-17T16:27:31.022+01:00There're just too many toops on show there. It...There're just too many toops on show there. It is overwhelming.Hairy Palmernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-11616508604169297912010-02-15T20:28:32.072+01:002010-02-15T20:28:32.072+01:00Nice play, but bad wig. Too shaggy, and the tail o...Nice play, but bad wig. Too shaggy, and the tail of it is too obvious, showing how fake it is. It was the beggining of a decade of hairy mistakes for Bill Shatner.Marcnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-67261419142703905822010-02-15T19:45:10.153+01:002010-02-15T19:45:10.153+01:00did jack cassidy wear a rugpiece on this show?
Sha...did jack cassidy wear a rugpiece on this show?<br />Shatner overacted, but it was better quality overacting than he had ever done before. His toupee should have won an award, too.crosby stills and shatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-43098626002371735012010-02-15T19:11:27.260+01:002010-02-15T19:11:27.260+01:00Should have gotten an emmy nominationShould have gotten an emmy nominationAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1249569588037368037.post-75131551177467289372010-02-15T15:57:31.802+01:002010-02-15T15:57:31.802+01:00Bill truly is in top form here ... a must-see for ...Bill truly is in top form here ... a must-see for Shat fans and classic TV fans. If I'm not mistaken, this is the production during which Bill met Marcy, his second wife.<br /><br />[<i>Side note for editor: Although the picture of Richard Basehart is correctly credited, he is incorrectly credited in the plot description as William Basehart.</i>]That Guynoreply@blogger.com