Monday, June 18, 2012

Visiting Hours - a toupological analysis.

Visiting Hours is a 1982 Canadian feature film starring Michael Ironside, Lee Grant, Linda Purl and William Shatner. Numbers two and four in that list are reunited on screen for the second time, having both starred together in 1968's Perilous Voyage and subsequently also an episode of this TV show.

The (thin) plot begins with reporter Deborah Ballin (Grant) in trouble for crossing a line between reporting and editorializing over the story of a battered wife facing prosecution for taking the law into her own hands against her husband.

Her boss, producer Gary Baylor (Shatner), is furious at Ballin's apparent on-screen feminist campaigning.

It seems the segment will be pulled.

But that's not the anger she should be concerned with. A member of the studio's cleaning crew, Colt Hawker (Ironside), is watching...

...and is haunted by Impulse-esque traumatic childhood memories of his father abusing his mother.

It's all made him into a psycho misogynist and now this journalist is speaking up for women's rights. So it's time for a killing spree, he decides. The serial killer goes after Ballin, turning up at her home.

Will Hawker get to Ballin, now recovering in hospital from her attack?

Who else will the madman go after?

How long will it take for someone to tip off the police about the killer's identity?

And how long until Gary Baylor (that's Shatner's character!) reappears and does something in this movie?

So many questions? Will they all be answered by the movie's climax?

So what to make of all this? Glad when it was over - relieved at the prospect of never having to voluntarily sit through this movie again! Not encouraging emotions at all... Frankly, we found Visiting Hours to be a thoroughly mediocre experience. The direction is so flat that one never really feels privy to a cinematic experience of any kind. The ruthlessness of The Terminator; the medical goings on of Coma (which also has a female lead); the claustrophobia of John Carpenter's Assault on Precinct 13 - to paraphrase a famous debate statement in American politics: director Jean-Claude Lord sure ain't no John Carpenter.

Indeed, no matter how hard it tries with its almost mechanically and formulaically constructed array of horror contrivances and clichés, it all feels far more like a TV movie than a feature film. Among other things, TV movies need great scripts to work and that is certainly not the case here. Unbelievably crass dialogue (including endless examples of characters describing the character traits of other characters, such as "So shy" and enough dramatic pauses throughout to put even Bill Shatner to shame)...

GRANT: I'm not going home, I want to walk. [Exits]

SHATNER: Now, wait a minute! Alright, walk! [Long pause - end of scene]

...little characterization or plot, poor pacing, and head-scratching flaws in logic. Illustrating the latter: the psycho-killer Colt Hawker spends the entire movie slipping in and out of the hospital and homes that he is laying siege to. After a while, one can't help but think: are the police in this movie completely stupid or something? Is it really so hard to secure a hospital and protect a few specific people? What's with all the empty hospital corridors? Why is there no police chief character on the case?

The movie isn't entirely without merits, including decent, rich early 80s cinematography. And around 5% of the "scary" scenes genuinely do evoke a sense of some terror. Particularly the early scene in which Lee Grant finds herself pursued in her own home by the faceless intruder.

Others, like a scene in which Hawker - not only a psychopath, but also a voyeur and sadist - brings home a girl he has picked up only to brutally assault her, border on salacious and disturbing.

Lee Grant (still amazing-looking here despite being in her fifties at the time) gives a typically strong performance as does Michael Ironside as the creepy killer. As for Bill Shatner, his role is so Sulu-esque as to be almost perfunctory. He has a few scenes in Visiting Hours, playing the concerned TV producer but there's just no real meat there to chew on. As shocking as this is to say - William Shatner is in a film in which he doesn't really leave that typical Shatneresque stamp of "I'm here, look at me!". It's all very understated and insubstantial.

Why on earth did the actor take this role? Perhaps it's because as a man who has always believed in the power of "yes!!", Bill Shatner is hardly going to change that to "no" when presented with another opportunity to work with (the almost eternally and mysteriously bewigged) Lee Grant!

Let's move swiftly to the hair!

Bill Shatner's relatively brief screen time, coupled with his rather thankless role, sadly don't leave much in the way of MTOs (Moments of Toupological Opportunity) or MTIs (Moments of Toupological Interest). In the scene pictured above, the actor looks wistfully at a fresh flower - alas, the petals shall soon whither and ultimately detach themselves from the plant stem, leaving a raw bud - nature can be so cruel. It's a subtle moment, but in a movie otherwise lacking in such emotional complexities, Bill Shatner uses his unique ability to present toupological subtext to at least partially lift the scene and the movie.

In this early scene, we also have an interesting over-the-shoulder shot enabling us to see the back of Bill Shatner's head, an area often far more unpredictable than the toupee above.

Overall, what we have here is a typical-for the times "TJ Curly" phase one, meaning a "top hat" weaved on to the head. By the time of Star Trek III, this had been replaced by a phase two toup, which was also secured down the front sides (more here).

Visiting Hours
is available on DVD (it's also currently up on YouTube, but who knows for how long...). A pretty lame experience. Let's close with a few more pictures of Lee Grant.


  1. james toupeerius kirkJune 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM

    nicely done, wssts!

    take a look at that:

    de forest kelley with a jkl !!!

    1. Wow, de forest kelley's hair is even more of a mystery than the Shat's. Don't know how he could have achieved such a thick bowl cut in Star Trek when he had such thin hair in this shot at a young age.

    2. We ask readers to take these results with a pinch of salt as our touposcopes are specifically calibrated for Bill Shatner, but an ambitious staffer tells us that he ran the De Kelley image through our Quantum Touposcopic Particle Oscillator and the resulting data suggested a 99.6408560743465411001001% likelihood that the actor's hair in the image is real. We'll try to get more details as they come in. Thanks! -ST

    3. I agree that kelley's hair in the picture james toupeerius kirk posted is real. I question his hair in Star Trek.

    4. joeyjojojrshabadoJune 20, 2012 at 6:04 AM

      james toupeerius kirk: that is a cool photo of dee kelly! I think his hair may have been enhanced on star trek with that big side-part he had.

      It's funny how he look pretty much the same his whole life, and you take a guy like shatner who looks very different than he did when he was in his thirties.

  2. Looks like footage from Visiting Hours made its way into the greatest YouTube video EVER!


  3. Clayton ForresterJune 19, 2012 at 4:10 AM

    In that first close-up photo of Shatner appearing above, you can really see why he needed to transition to the Phase 2 TJ Curly model. His side-hairline near the right temple goes way, way back. It doesn't look even remotely compatible with the thick slab of curls on top.

  4. a more rational, sane type of person would get rid of the thick slab of curls up on top and get something more modest looking and less ridiculous.
    but that ain't the shat

  5. He probably remembered working with her on Perilous Voyage and couldn't keep himself away from her.

    They probably both got paid pretty well for not having to do very much work. Why else would they do such a film?

  6. Shats own real syrupJune 25, 2012 at 11:23 PM

    Oh dear, why oh why, did the shat ever wear this, trashy toupee if you like people to really believe your hairs real, the least you can do, is get a hairpiece that looks real! Not a cap, that screams "this is a toupee" mmm its also very interesting the comments on de forest kelley, why did he have such a high forehead in photos in the late 40's early 50's than years later, have a much lower hairline he hair was thining in his early 30's but it strange with him, sometimes his hair looked real, sometimes very toupee! I am open to the fact, that either could be right.

  7. Shats own real syrupJune 27, 2012 at 9:40 PM

    Hi shat toup blog, excellent news, I have found another 1957 absolutely toupless young shat, its in reality, the photo that went (it seems) with the 1957 mccleans interview, so its 100% legit, eill give you, details very soon...can I text you please, about it.

    1. Hi Shats own real syrup. You can email us at Thanks! -ST

    2. Shats own real syrupJune 29, 2012 at 5:16 PM

      Hi shattoup just sent an e-mail to you, did it by mobile (cellphone) any probs, please let me know.

  8. STB - have you seen this movie

  9. Major toupage action can be seen on Bill's recent appearance on the Late Late Show.
    I am convinced by the argument that Bill braves it with his plugs on casual occasions but under the close scrutiny of studio lights, as he was in this occasion, he evidently wears a toup.

  10. Would love you to post that 1957 toupless photo.

    1. Hi Liv Long. Could it be scanned and sent electronically? -ST

  11. I don't have the photo. I was referring to the one mentioned by shat's own real syrup. I'm eager to see it.

    1. Forgive the error. We'll do a post on it at some point. Thanks! -ST


  13. Dear Sir / Madam,

    We are offering loans to the public with a very low rate of 3%. We offer out personal and business loans. Here are some few questions from us: Are you in debts? Do you want to pay of your debts? Are you in debt and you need an urgent loan? Do you need a real estate loan? Do you need secured or unsecured loan? Do you have plans in expanding your business? Do you want to get your self financially equipped? If yes then contact us and you will be given the best of all financial support. Many are out there that needs financial assistance with no opportunity But this is an opportunity you can’t afford to miss. We are out in the world to get most people that needs financial assistance financially equipped. For more information contact us via email:

    We offer the following Loans to interested and minded individual

    Vehicle Loans
    consolidation Loans
    Personal loans
    Business Loans
    Refinance Loans
    Home Loans
    Debt Consolidation
    House Renovation Loans
    Business Loans
    International Loans
    Celebrations Loans
    Pay Day Loans
    Urgent Loans


    3 Month bank statements to date latest salary must reflect.
    Clear copy of ID Book.
    Latest payslip if weekly or commission 4 latest pay slips
    4.Banking Account Details to receive the loan.

    1. chrome(dome) magnonDecember 7, 2016 at 11:13 AM

      Dear Rev Alex Scant
      I never knew there were so many different flavours of loans. However, in your (absent) terms and conditions, aren't you missing 'if you take out a loan with us and default we will take your car, house, possessions, internal organs, bone marrow and pets?'